Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Johan Nikles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Nikles analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Johan Nikles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Subervi 1 - 0 Nikles
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.07% of points on their second serve, while Nikles has won 45.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 56.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikles has won 53.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36% and 39.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 50.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikles has saved 60.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 42/ 22), with Nikles winning 63.89% (W/L 23/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 120/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 21/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subervi winning 1 times and Nikles being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Nikles winning 0. The last match between Subervi and Nikles was at the M25 Oviedo, 04-09-2019, Second, Clay with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Nikles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Subervi winning 0 times and Nikles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 1, and Nikles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.95 while Nikles has played against players with an average rank of 99.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikles has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 46.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikles has converted 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
428
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
868
Rank
256
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (279-209)
Career Total W/L
58% (265-193)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
64% (23-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$11,650
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Johan Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) | 74% (57/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (35/51) | 51% (29/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (12/27) | 60% (12/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/77) | 40% (31/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Johan Nikles
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Johan Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 64% (23/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 63% (51/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (390/319) | 56% (406/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 67% (20/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:8 | 1:12:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.82 | 99 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1509/2204) | 69% (1179/1721) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1004/1509) | 61% (714/1179) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (348/695) | 46% (249/542) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (126/272) | 47% (90/190) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1004/2295) | 45% (753/1689) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 70% (21/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (22/34) | 63% (22/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 81% (27/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 19% (27/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Mario Martinez Serrano
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
106)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
53 of
79)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Luka Pavlovic
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Subervi Vs Nikles Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
